We are pleased to bring you the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, and The Bill of Rights on our blog. We hope that you enjoy reading these important documents and that you take the time to read and study them. If you are interested in learning more about the principles the documents are based on, we recommend you take a look at "The Christian History of the Constitution," John Locke's "Two Treatisies on Government," David Mccullough's "John Adams," Catherine Drinker Bowen's "Miracle at Philadelphia," and "A More Perfect Union." For further primary research into Constitutional history, we also recommend going to The Constitutional Sources Project and checking out their collection of primary source documents.
Happy reading!
Monday, January 31, 2011
You're Not Listening
I attended a forum on gay marriage at Brigham Young University, presented by the Sociology department. The keynote speaker asked, “Why would you study the effects of pre-marital, physical intimacy on subsequent marriages?”
(read more...)
Thursday, January 27, 2011
State of the Union: New Tone, Same Tune
According to President Obama, "...if we truly care about our deficit, we simply cannot afford a permanent extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of Americans. Before we take money away from our schools, or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax breaks."
Is the President seriously asking us to suspend our reasonable disbelief and buy his argument about whose responsibility the deficit is? That doesn't make sense; Every spending bill signed by President Obama directly added to the ever increasing federal deficit.
Labels:
Congressional Budget Office,
deficit,
Obamacare,
President Obama,
TARP,
tax rate
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
The Constitution Does Matter
Would Ms. Fredrickson go to President Kennedy and say , "We've had lots of changes from your day to ours, like the internet and ipods, so we're going to ignore the whole intent of the Civil Rights act of 1964"? (read more...)
Monday, January 24, 2011
Quick Thoughts: University of Virginia's Global Warming Problem
Virginia's Attorney General, Ken Cuccinelli, has subpoenaed documents from a scientist working at the University of Virginia. Such an action is permissible under a statute passed in 2002 to help curb and prevent employees at public Universities from defrauding public tax dollars. The Democrats in the State Assembly are, of course, aghast.
Funny that the Democrats should be concerned about the use of the subpoena for investigating potential misuse of public dollars; aren't they supposed to be the party of ethics and governmental responsibility? (I guess that that principle goes out the window when they hope to use the issue to gain electoral ground (read the Washington Post story here)).
Suspicions about the professor have led to previous investigations as well. Chances are that if he's raised eyebrows before, he's likely to raise them again.
If he did tamper with his evidence and data then he is defrauding the public of tax dollars and needs to be punished.
Funny that the Democrats should be concerned about the use of the subpoena for investigating potential misuse of public dollars; aren't they supposed to be the party of ethics and governmental responsibility? (I guess that that principle goes out the window when they hope to use the issue to gain electoral ground (read the Washington Post story here)).
Suspicions about the professor have led to previous investigations as well. Chances are that if he's raised eyebrows before, he's likely to raise them again.
If he did tamper with his evidence and data then he is defrauding the public of tax dollars and needs to be punished.
Rahm Emmanuel Is Not a Chicago Resident
An appellate panel in Chicago ruled that Rahm Emanuel is not a Chicago resident and is ineligible to run for Mayor (read it here). People are now bemoaning the judicial activism in the courts because of this ruling. This in spite of the fact that the courts are designated to rule on legal issues.
It makes you wonder why people want Rahm as Mayor in the first place. Chicago is notorious for its corrupt politicians. Why do they think that Rahm would be that much better?
It makes you wonder why people want Rahm as Mayor in the first place. Chicago is notorious for its corrupt politicians. Why do they think that Rahm would be that much better?
Friday, January 21, 2011
Quick Thoughts: Obamacare Replacement
It looks like Ezra Klein was wrong again. Yesterday he savaged the republicans for repealing Obamacare but not having a replacement. Little did he know (or maybe he wasn't paying attention) that the GOP was working to make good replacement policy (read about it here). The GOP has set up committees to actually study and find verifiable evidence of policies which would actually cause health care costs to go down and not skyrocket like they have so far under Obamacare. Some of the possible policies that they are looking at include: buying insurance across state lines, creating insurance associations to decrease costs and others.
It's kind of a shock to have Congress trying to look at market based reforms and methods of improving the market before passing laws.
Make your voices heard too. Contact your Congressmen and Senators by visiting their webpages: http://www.house.gov/ and http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
It's kind of a shock to have Congress trying to look at market based reforms and methods of improving the market before passing laws.
Make your voices heard too. Contact your Congressmen and Senators by visiting their webpages: http://www.house.gov/ and http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Time to Stand Up for Human Rights
Something about that answer just doesn't sit well with most Americans. Aren't these rights supposed to be for everyone? And isn't everyone supposed to benefit from a government that protects them? (read more...)
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Obamacare Repealed! Why do we need to replace it?
His point might be valid if it weren't fatally flawed. He completely ignores the faulty premises of Obamacare. We'll forgive him since he is young (26) and can't understand old things. (read more...)
Labels:
COBRA,
Department of HHS,
Ezra Klein,
Obamacare,
The Constitution,
Washington Post
News: Obamacare Repealed!
One year after the passage of Obamacare, the House of Representatives voted yesterday in a 245 to 189 vote, to repeal Obamacare. Now we wait to see if Harry Reid will bring it to the floor of the Senate for a vote. If you'd like to contact your senator click here. Hopefully the Senate will be persuaded that Obamacare needs to be repealed. Let's let our voices be heard!
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Sarah Palin as Eva Peron?
Eugene Robinson, in his editorial today (click here to read it), said that Sarah Palin, reminds him of Eva Peron. ...Really?
Perhaps he meant to compare the way in which they both came to govern? Oh, wait, no, Eva Peron was never elected (though she was nominated once).
Since Evita didn't ever win an election maybe he means that they gained popularity and power the same way? If that is the case then Robinson is calling Palin some sort of whore or slut; Evita slept her way to the top.
(read more...)
Lessons from Tucson: Part II
Monday, January 17, 2011
Loughner was a Bush Hater
The Communist Manifesto |
Mein Kampf |
The New York Times just reported that Jared Loughner hated (well, probably still hates) George W. Bush, and that some of his favorite books were: the Communist Manifesto, Mein Kampf, Animal Farm, and Farenheit 451. Much to the dismay of the news outlets, Sheriff Dupnik, Barak Obama, and some Palin haters, it would appear that Loughner was more of a product of radical leftists, than of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and the Tea Party. Click here to read the full story.
Lessons from Tucson: Part I
How horrific that a gunman should kill in America at a peaceful political assembly. Unfortunately there has been a nationwide rush to blame talk radio, Sarah Palin, and political rhetoric. The fact that Loughner didn't like the news, politics, or tv, didn't stop the media from making the connection between Loughner's violence and vitriolic rhetoric. (read more...)
Friday, January 14, 2011
Quick Thoughts: No federal funds means federal control?
NPR is fearful of more governmental intrusion over two recent bills introduced by Rep Doug Lamborn to cut off federal subsidies to NPR and reduce federal spending.
I would understand if the fear were about losing money and suddenly having to compete in the marketplace that everyone else in radio does, but I'm a little confused about being afraid of the government controlling your broadcasting without giving you money?
That's a bit odd, because when you loose federal funding, you usually loose the strings that come with that money. When the federal government gives you the strings without the money, that's called an unfunded mandate. Usually, only States have to deal with both funded and unfunded mandates from the feds (think No Child Left Behind and Obamacare) and they hate both.
You would think that the fact Rep. Slaughter (remember her rule that would have "deemed" Obamacare into law without a vote?) is trying to increase FCC control what is said and how it is said over the airwaves would be more worrisome for NPR.
It makes you wonder if NPR is trying to be a propaganda machine?
CBS Poll: Tucson Shooting and Rhetoric Not Related
Breaking news!
CBS just did a poll indicating that over 55% of people don't feel that the Tucson shooting and political rhetoric are related.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20028105-503544.html
Contrary to the suppositions of those clamoring for the FCC to reinstate the "fairness doctrine" (regulation requiring radio broadcasters to give equal time to opposing voices) people are able, at least in this instance, to see what is reported to them and decide the truth for themselves.
Now, how much more informed would we be if the news outlets would actually report?
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Anger is a feeling, not a crime.
Although the president referred to his political opponents as enemies requiring punishment, it appears that he has turned a new leaf calling for us to remove anger from our political discourse. That begs the question, "Is there a case for political anger?"
First of all, anger is not violence. What Loughner did was horrific, but it was an action, and not a feeling. (And since when are we supposed to be legally judged on our feelings?) Anger is a feeling, which in this case means that people feel strongly about what is going on in government. Most people are fed up with the actions taken by the Obama Administration (e.g. the Food Safety Bill, Obamacare, TARP, forced selling of Chrysler and GM, the offshore Oil drilling ban, EPA regulation of CO2 etc.)and their willing accomplices in Congress.
Most people who feel like this (over half of the country) have spoken up, voted, and tried to stop the Federal government from doing similar things. Will getting rid of this "anger" help political discourse?
Probably not.
(read more...)
Look at that: Polling on Obamacare and Deficit
Rasmussen Reports just came out with a poll showing that only 29% of people think that repealing Obamacare will increase the deficit. A huge majority of Americans get what the CBO, and Nancy Pelosi seem unable to understand: adding another trillion dollars (estimated conservatively) to the Federal budget increases the deficit, regardless of how many times we double count "savings" from Medicare. The tax increases in the bill aren't going to bring in as much in revenue estimated either. Tax increases usually equal lesser federal revenues, while lower taxes usually equal higher tax revenues. Just look at the JFK, Reagan, and Bush '43 tax cuts. Tax revenues increased after each tax cut.
Here's to hoping for a repeal of Obamacare.
Here's to hoping for a repeal of Obamacare.
Monday, January 10, 2011
Quick Thoughts: Protecting us from Carbon Dioxide
The whole idea of checks and balances built into the Constitution is to stop the government from gaining too much power. Just think of the crabs in the bucket analogy and you'll understand the reason why. (read more...)
Quick Thoughts: A Crabby Analogy
If you've ever gone crabbing, you've seen the selfish behavior of crabs. When you pull your crabs out of the trap and put them in a bucket they will try to escape. Inevitably whenever one tries to get to the top, the others will pull him back down. The bucket stays full of crabs because none of them will allow any of the others to get out.
Usually we think of this attitude being a bad thing, i.e. not allowing someone in your community to achieve and leave their bad circumstances. Businesses, too, will explain the negative effects of the crab in a bucket mentality to inspire their workers to work more efficiently.
When applied to a government, however, this is a great thing. The different branches of government have a tendency to try and do more and take more power. The Founders used checks and balances to allow the different branches to use that mentality to stop other branches from taking more and more power (for more detail on that see here).
The more the government does, the less we are able to do ourselves. The less they do, the more freedoms we have. This built in feature of using jealousy to have government restrain itself is kind of comforting.
Usually we think of this attitude being a bad thing, i.e. not allowing someone in your community to achieve and leave their bad circumstances. Businesses, too, will explain the negative effects of the crab in a bucket mentality to inspire their workers to work more efficiently.
When applied to a government, however, this is a great thing. The different branches of government have a tendency to try and do more and take more power. The Founders used checks and balances to allow the different branches to use that mentality to stop other branches from taking more and more power (for more detail on that see here).
The more the government does, the less we are able to do ourselves. The less they do, the more freedoms we have. This built in feature of using jealousy to have government restrain itself is kind of comforting.
Friday, January 7, 2011
Obamacare Increases the Deficit
It seems to me that the esteemed Mr. Klein at the Washington Post has been given misinformation about the effect of Obamacare on Federal spending. "But wait," you say, "The CBO just came out with a report showing that repealing Obamacare will cost a hundred billion dollars!" True, they did come out with that report. Problem is, that report is based on the flawed assumptions given to them by then-Speaker Pelosi, and double counts a huge amount of "savings." Cuts to Medicare, for example, are counted twice. (read more...)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)